Floodgates Publishing
Home The Claim The Case The Argument Buy
Resources
App A — Law vs Gospel Commands App B — Unified Gospel Response App C — Conversions in Acts App D — Early Church Writings App E — Chain of Witness App F — Common Objections App G — Difficult Cases App H — Modes of Response App I — Holy Spirit Baptism App J — Contemporary Scholarship Study Bot
Appendix A

Law Commands vs Gospel Commands

Paul's distinction between works of law and the obedience of faith—why baptism is a Gospel Command, not works-righteousness.

Paul provides the biblical terminology for this distinction. He calls law-keeping “works of law” (Romans 3:20, 28; Galatians 2:16) and describes the gospel response as “the obedience of faith” (Romans 1:5; 16:26). These are Paul’s own categories: works that attempt to earn salvation versus faith expressing itself through obedience to God’s commanded gospel response. This terminology comes from Jack Cottrell; see Grace Distinctions #4: Two Kinds of Commands at JackCottrell.com.

Law Commands reveal sin and guide holy living. Gospel Commands receive grace and enter us into Christ. This distinction resolves the objection that baptism constitutes works-righteousness—baptism is not a work that earns salvation but a Gospel Command that receives it.

Table 2. Law Commands vs Gospel Commands

Law Commands vs Gospel Commands comparison table
⇩ Download PDF

This appendix is reproduced from Eternal Stakes: The Response Grace Demands by Joe Tenga. For the full argument, including Chapter 1 that develops this material, see the book.

Read the full argument.

Eternal Stakes develops the case across seventeen chapters, ten appendices, and a companion AI study bot trained on all of it.

More Resources